Revealed! hone's Original Transcript

Some Probably Racist Waiting Staff - Yesterday

The following is Hone Harawira's original letter to the Maori Party before it was edited and submitted by Queen's Counsel Peter Williams. "Mr Williams yesterday confirmed he was acting for Mr Harawira and had written a "detailed letter" to the party outlining the Te Tai Tokerau MP's position. He would not comment further." said The Herald.

Look you bunch of jive turkeys motherf****r, If you don't stop threatening to kick me out of your party I'm gonna come round to your cribs and pop a cap in your on your sorry brown a**s. Especially that b**** Turia who should get back in the f**** kitchen and stop trying to play with the m** folk. And Pita, watch your back, man. You think a fancy w***e man's degree will protect you. You f***n sell-out. I Think you're a f***g porch-n****r now, wel f**k you, bro.


Colonialism - The Harsh Reality

Look what you made me do. I had to get me a brief. You think I wanted to get this white motherf**** to represent me in this sorry-*** letter? Now you're making me look like 'the man' hiring clever 'intellectuals' to scrutinise every word of my contract and find a little loophole I can crawl through. he's a funny dude though, this Peter Williams dude. For a mother f***n honky.

M*****rs.

IfI were you I'd just forget all this puritanical b****t and let's just let bygones be bygones. Its not like I called you guys motherf***rs, so what's the problem? Ok so I might have pissed of a few h***, but who give a s**t what they think, right? They've been calling me a n****r for, like ages. You fake sell-outs. I thought we were down.



SO what if I went to Paris? It was research! I thought if you really wanted to se how those honky ba**** think, where better to go than the racist capital of Europe. I was gonna deop in on some of Ahmed Zaouis' bros and keep it real with the fight against the man in Algeria. But Hilda wanted to do the Louvre. Full of shit they stole off our brown cousins all over the place. Some of it was quite tasty. Honky ba***ds. Stealing our f***g art and s**t.

F***n honky motherf***rs are at it all the f**n time. And I'm supposed to take it. Like all the time man. You can see it in their eyes. Like just yesterday some b****h in a coffee shop asked me to my face if I wanted 'my coffee white'? I know what she was saying. Racist b*****. Bet she never had it hard on the streets like I did. F*** wh***. Soon put that b***h straight. I told her to shut the f**k up or she'd get a hiding. Because that's all she was good for. Becasue she was a w*** motherf***r too. Honky Mother*****r bitch-wh***s deserved a bit of straight-talk instead of all this f**n around with niceties. That's the kind of hypocritical game those f***** honkies play. Not me. I'm a straight-talking brother. If a few rapists and pillagers don't like 'straight-talking Hone', then f**k them They didn't give a f**k about 'being nice' when she and her type were raping my great-grannie. Did they?

So f**K them. F**k the media and f***k you two too. You vanilla-ice wannabee whitey sell-outs, with your fancy ways. Not like me, out there on the streets. Keepin it real.

Motherf***rs.

Peace out,

'Homey' Harawira


Of course, Peter William's version left out the rude bits. And the pictures.

I really Love you, Fatty Fatty . . .

LIMA, Peru - Peruvian police say they have broken up a band of assassins who killed people in order to extract and sell their body fat.

Police Col. Jorge Mejia says three people arrested in the remote Huanuco province have confessed to five killings, telling police they could sell one litre of human fat for $15,000 (NZ$20,500).

Mejia told reporters Thursday the suspects told police the fat was sold to intermediaries in Lima, who police suspect sold it to cosmetic and pharmaceutical companies in Europe.

Police say they cannot confirm the fat was sold.

They say, however, that they have recovered the head of one of the victims and several bottles of fat.

Medical experts contacted by The Associated Press expressed serious doubts about a global market for human fat.

- AP

Praise Junkies

I cringe everytime I hear the defence for or against the 'anti-smacking bill' constructed around the shameful prevailance of child-abuse and murder in this country.
As if, until s.59 was passed, child abuse and child murder was a socially constructed norm, supported by a philosophy that is it 'ok' to 'beat' children. So ingrained is New Zealand's blood-lust and carnal craving for more dead and abused children, that these monstrous sub-humans (or 'neanderthals' is the accepted rather prissy and superior put-down) are taking to the streets. Perhaps at the end of Queen street, they might erect a pyramid of the recently slain and abused little people and set fire to it, or something. There could be public floggings of infants to the cries of 'Beat the Meat!'. It could be less of a medieval debacle and more (what's teh modern word?) a 'celebration'. Come on Lefties you know you want to say it but don't have the minerals, because yo are weak and were not properly disciplined as children .. .
Ahem. But I digress. Anyway . . . .
So by implication, anyone who is opposed to the 'anti-smacking' bill is, in fact a de-facto child-abuser or child-murderer. Or if they aren't they secretly endorse child-abuse and child-murder. Goes the 'argument'.
Such a pathetic syllogism is usually exposed and discounted as a valid form of logical appraisal in the first semester of any philosophy class.
But everytime the anti-smacking law is debated, these logically-flawed, intellectually lazy assertions are wheeled out, like a kiddie-cadaver on a three-wheeled gurney, as if its mere presence is going to silence opposition and 'pro-smackers' are going to say;
"Oh, I see what you are saying now! That kiddie-cadaver has shocked some real sense into me."
But one of the most intriguing aspects of this debate is the psychology of the adherents to each cause. Let us presume that all those in favour of 'smacking' were smacked. And all those in favour of not smacking were not smacked.
Then weigh up the difference in their approaches to the issue.
I find that those opposed to 'smacking' tend to approach their argument from three main aspects. The first is 'All pro-smackers are de-facto child-abusers'. The second is 'All opposition to the s.59 is a call for the 'right' to beat children'. The third is 'Our way is best and should be enforced upon everyone by law.'
Those in favour of smacking tend to approach their argument thus. 'Child-abuse is not linked to to smacking children.' 'It should not be a legal requirement not to discipline your child by physical means.'
'the promotion of s.59 is state interference in how we should raise our children and should not be enforced on everyond by law.'
On the face of it, I think that the pro-smackers have a sounder and more sophisticated argument.

Now the elephant in the room.
Have the 'pro-smackers' achieved their ability to discriminate for themselves and ability to resist intellectually flawed strong-arming by the social engineers because they were smacked as children? ie were they raised better, and discipline was an aspect of this better upbringing?
That alone would suggest to me that smacking kids leads to better-rounded adults with superior discriminatory faculties and that not smacking kids leads to adults who are praise junkies, spoiled and unable to deal with challenging ideas without storming out of the room in a hissy. Like its very own architect, Sue Bradford did to the Greens when she was denied Co-Leadership.

On the other hand it would also indicate (to me) that abusing kids and murdering kids is done by people who don't give a shit about the law. They certainly aren't the types who so care about being active and involved in the raising of their children that they would go on a march to defend the sanctity of that relationship.

So why all this insulting reductionistic clap-trap from teh 'anti-smackers'? Because deep deep down, the 'anti-smackers' don't actually have a valid argument in favour of their position. Instead they rely on emotionalistic clap-trap about 'the bash', backed up by a bully-boy tactics of trying to cow opposition into silence with risibly flawed logic.